... | ... | @@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ The current picture is: |
|
|
| U 19/10 | #163 BPM images saving while acquisition | 2 | 31/10/2017 |
|
|
|
| U 19/10 | #164 Summary of tasks for BLISS Roadmap | 3 | 20/10/2017 |
|
|
|
| U 23/10 | #167 ID31 potentiostat scan | 3 | 23/10/2017 |
|
|
|
| | **Planned Total** | 42 | 6 |
|
|
|
| | **Planned Total** | 42 | 3 |
|
|
|
| | **Unplanned Total** | 13 | 8 |
|
|
|
| | **Grand Total** | **55** | **14** |
|
|
|
| | **Grand Total** | **55** | **11** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please note that
|
|
|
1. three unplanned items (#162, #163, #164) were added 19th of October.
|
... | ... | @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ Please note that |
|
|
3. On 24th October item #151 was done instead of #150. The item #151 is unplanned but as it replaces a planned item we are not marking it as unplanned additional work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And the burn down chart looks like this:
|
|
|
![image](/uploads/7401fef29cc51e75c1a2bdc1fb096c0d/image.png)
|
|
|
![image](/uploads/673fee8950b84b8b4140ed2e5af10c3e/image.png)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, it is worth pointing that if all the work done in the unplanned items would have been done instead on planned items the burn down chart would look a lot better:
|
|
|
![image](/uploads/060176eedea5eb6a8ffdb5c50e8f4839/image.png) |
|
|
![image](/uploads/5a06cde1881254b4426bd255eec80062/image.png) |