nodes with "pure" ancestors (have no predecessors) cannot be start nodes (!6) · Merge requests · Olof Svensson / workflow_concepts

Wout De Nolf requested to merge denolf/workflow_concepts:test1 into test1 May 28, 2021

Fix bug: nodes with "pure" ancestors (have no predecessors) cannot be start nodes

The bug had nothing to do with submodels. Basically in workflow12 the IN node of the submodel was considered a start node because it had all information to start. This meant all required input is available before running anything and it has only conditional predecessors. However these criteria for being a start node were not enough.

nodes with "pure" ancestors (have no predecessors) cannot be start nodes

Merge request reports