ct output should be improved
Here is the current output
DEMO_SESSION [5]: ct(1)
Tue Mar 17 11:06:04 2020
acq_time = 1.0306761264801025 ( 1.0306761264801025/s)
fwhm_x = 515.7085530454503 ( 515.7085530454503/s)
fwhm_y = 39.83362526947701 ( 39.83362526947701/s)
intensity = 1636.8 ( 1636.8/s)
x = 502.80100232323565 ( 502.80100232323565/s)
y = 483.97297174946493 ( 483.97297174946493/s)
roi1_avg = 29.301262554597148 ( 29.301262554597148/s)
roi1_max = 2478.0 ( 2478.0/s)
roi1_min = 0.0
roi1_std = 201.1883752018486 ( 201.1883752018486/s)
roi1_sum = 30664621.0 ( 30664621.0/s)
diode1 = 51.77740740740742 ( 51.77740740740742/s)
diode2 = 50.99740740740741 ( 50.99740740740741/s)
Out [5]: Scan(number=3, name=ct, path=)
It would be nice at least to align the dots
DEMO_SESSION [5]: ct(1)
Tue Mar 17 11:06:04 2020
acq_time = 1.0306761264801025 ( 1.0306761264801025/s)
fwhm_x = 515.7085530454503 ( 515.7085530454503/s)
fwhm_y = 39.83362526947701 ( 39.83362526947701/s)
intensity = 1636.8 ( 1636.8/s)
x = 502.80100232323565 ( 502.80100232323565/s)
y = 483.97297174946493 ( 483.97297174946493/s)
roi1_avg = 29.301262554597148 ( 29.301262554597148/s)
roi1_max = 2478.0 ( 2478.0/s)
roi1_min = 0.0
roi1_std = 201.1883752018486 ( 201.1883752018486/s)
roi1_sum = 30664621.0 (30664621.0/s)
diode1 = 51.77740740740742 ( 51.77740740740742/s)
diode2 = 50.99740740740741 ( 50.99740740740741/s)
Out [5]: Scan(number=3, name=ct, path=)